<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad Software Buying Habits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.solutionexplorers.com/2009/12/bad-software-buying-habits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.solutionexplorers.com/2009/12/bad-software-buying-habits/</link>
	<description>Transforming the Software Technology Buying &#38; Selling Experience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 06:18:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Keith German</title>
		<link>http://blog.solutionexplorers.com/2009/12/bad-software-buying-habits/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith German</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.solutionexplorers.com/?p=56#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Brad - you&#039;re spot on in these obsersations. Keep an eye on the latter one as many buyers and the software technology industry appears to be moving toward hosted, Saas, web-based solutions. These have many upsides I believe. One drawback it appears in the Saas world, however, is that most of these providers select the database; and as you indicated it is proprietary. In fact, I&#039;ll give some thought now to writing a post outline some differences between hosted, Web-based, Saas, and on-premise client/server applications. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad &#8211; you&#39;re spot on in these obsersations. Keep an eye on the latter one as many buyers and the software technology industry appears to be moving toward hosted, Saas, web-based solutions. These have many upsides I believe. One drawback it appears in the Saas world, however, is that most of these providers select the database; and as you indicated it is proprietary. In fact, I&#39;ll give some thought now to writing a post outline some differences between hosted, Web-based, Saas, and on-premise client/server applications. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bradclosson</title>
		<link>http://blog.solutionexplorers.com/2009/12/bad-software-buying-habits/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>bradclosson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 06:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.solutionexplorers.com/?p=56#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Gosh Keith, I think one that comes to mind in my experience is having the management team select a tool for the masses to use without the actual users getting any say.  This goes hand in hand with your #1 issue.  Another problem I&#039;ve seen which is an extension of your #4, is purchasing a software solution that has a proprietary back end.  In particular, a back end that does not allow for simple exports to Excel, Access, SQL, etc...  Products need to always have the ability to &quot;kick&quot; out data to other formats.   Good article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh Keith, I think one that comes to mind in my experience is having the management team select a tool for the masses to use without the actual users getting any say.  This goes hand in hand with your #1 issue.  Another problem I&#39;ve seen which is an extension of your #4, is purchasing a software solution that has a proprietary back end.  In particular, a back end that does not allow for simple exports to Excel, Access, SQL, etc&#8230;  Products need to always have the ability to &#8220;kick&#8221; out data to other formats.   Good article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith German</title>
		<link>http://blog.solutionexplorers.com/2009/12/bad-software-buying-habits/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith German</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.solutionexplorers.com/?p=56#comment-9</guid>
		<description>David - what an excellent addition. One of my objectives as I help businesses with effective evaluations is to engage those most impacted by the application change early in the process so that their concerns and opinions are heard. Thanks for commenting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David &#8211; what an excellent addition. One of my objectives as I help businesses with effective evaluations is to engage those most impacted by the application change early in the process so that their concerns and opinions are heard. Thanks for commenting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Clark</title>
		<link>http://blog.solutionexplorers.com/2009/12/bad-software-buying-habits/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>David Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.solutionexplorers.com/?p=56#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Excellent post, and yes, the 7 points above can all lead to software selection disaster--or at the least, serious and long-term IT headaches. Another critical factor in the software selection process is user buy-in as a component of change management. Even if you select a &quot;best-fit&quot; enterprise system, failure to obtain user buy-in at the selection stage will result in low user adoption rates, pervasive workarounds, and epidemics of information silos. See my posting at &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2007/12/06/how-to-kill-a-software-selection-project-in-10-very-easy-steps/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2007/...&lt;/a&gt; for more disasters in the making!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All the best, and thanks for an insightful posting.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;David Clark&lt;br&gt;Managing Editor&lt;br&gt;Technology Evaluation Centers&lt;br&gt;&quot;Enterprise Software Evaluations: Simply Decide&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post, and yes, the 7 points above can all lead to software selection disaster&#8211;or at the least, serious and long-term IT headaches. Another critical factor in the software selection process is user buy-in as a component of change management. Even if you select a &#8220;best-fit&#8221; enterprise system, failure to obtain user buy-in at the selection stage will result in low user adoption rates, pervasive workarounds, and epidemics of information silos. See my posting at <a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2007/12/06/how-to-kill-a-software-selection-project-in-10-very-easy-steps/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2007/.." rel="nofollow">http://blog.technologyevaluation.com/blog/2007/..</a>. for more disasters in the making!</p>
<p>All the best, and thanks for an insightful posting.</p>
<p>David Clark<br />Managing Editor<br />Technology Evaluation Centers<br />&#8220;Enterprise Software Evaluations: Simply Decide&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

